Template talk:Drop enabled base item table

Should extra_conditions be able to ignore other conditions?

Currently, it's possible to make the extra_conditions to ignore all the other conditions the template defines and I think that's outside the scope of these templates (There's {{SMW item table}} for those tables). {{Query unique items|extra_conditions=[[Has name::Blightwell]] OR [[Has name::Eyes of the Greatwolf]]}} displays Eyes of the GreatwolfEyes of the Greatwolf
Greatwolf TalismanTalisman Tier: 4
Requires Level 52<Two random talisman implicit modifiers>Implicit Modifier magnitudes are doubledCorruptedI am but a vessel for a greater force.
It acts through me. Speaks through me.
Decides what lives and dies through me.
And will change the world through me. even though the template doesn't allow drop disabled items to show. This can be fixed with <q>{{{extra_conditions|}}}</q> if it's not intentional. --Illviljan (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

I agree. The template should be made more restrictive. Not sure how to go about that though. Maybe instead of leaving extra_conditions completely open ended, we can determine some useful customizations that are within the scope of what this template is supposed to do and create parameters for those. —Vini (t|c) 01:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, extra_conditions shouldn't have an ability to override the template conditions. I think it's safe to make the change. — TheFrz — 07:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. This may affect tables that intentionally showed talismans and other drop disabled items. --Illviljan (talk) 12:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)